Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
A forum for discussion and clarification of philosophical issues relevant to class.
Class calendar
Simple html version, or add it to your google account: 
Subscribe to this blog!
Subscribe through e-mail!
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(48)
-
▼
April
(21)
- Social Contract Theory
- Student-run review sessions
- I have questions for anyone who cares to answer re...
- ARE YOU KIDDING ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Notes on Hume
- Abortion.....right or wrong
- questions for my paper
- quick question
- Texas Law is Smart
- Foreign Aid Needs To Go
- Nietzsche reading
- legalizing marijuana
- legalizing marijuana
- Legalizing Marijuana
- "OUTSOURCING"
- Times Herald Record article
- Term Paper
- Easter
- Order of Oral Presentations
- Reading for next week
- Glossary of Kant's Technical Terms
-
▼
April
(21)
3 comments:
I read the chapter.....The last sentence states that the theory is a flaw. Call me crazy but it seems that all of them have flaws. My understanding to the contact is that every one needs to agree and obey. The idea is not about being out for you but have everyones interest in mind. Is this correct?! It would be amamzing if everyone did agree to that.It should not depend on generation to generation.
That is what it says, yes.
Also, all the theories are flawed in someway, otherwise we would all be one or the other (besides Ultilitarianists).
Was there a theory or code that did not present a lot of flaws, or at least had the least/
According to my understanding you must have a self-interest into the contract you are going into. One must also understand or have evaluated that the benefit will be greater than the punishment one will receive, if we violate it.
Post a Comment